iainjclark: Dave McKean Sandman image (TV)
[personal profile] iainjclark
I really enjoyed this one. A fairly functional plot was used as a jumping off point for all manner of interesting, witty and imaginative ideas and images.

After a slightly surreal but otherwise grounded first episode, the production immediately ramped-up to Farscape-levels of visual and conceptual weirdness. It was pervaded with a sense of "fun" without ever quite crossing the line from satire into parody. Or to put it another way, although some of the ideas were cheeky-verging-on-silly, Mr Davies demonstrated an immensely well-judged sense of where to draw the line. Likewise there was a very nicely-pitched level of jeopardy, with the Doctor's breezy unconcern and Deus Ex Machina rescues being offset by moments of seriousness. I especially liked his little "zen" moment of stepping though the fan. The fan itself is a good example of just how narrowly the episode walked the line between "fun" and "ridiculous". In some ways the programme relied on the audience's goodwill, but since it generated vast reserves of the stuff from the moment it began, it had plenty to spare.

The two central characters remained completely three dimensional (or should that be four dimensional..?) with Rose's reactions to being spirited away in the Tardis seeming far more psychologically real and believable than any companion I can think of. Her relationship with the Doctor continues to be flirtatious, but not quite actively romantic. Certainly their relationship is much more along those lines than most previous companions. I enjoyed Rose's delight at the Doctor's cockiness early on, and the emotional rollercoaster ride this episode took her on. Once again, Billie Piper's performance actively impressed me.

Needless to say Christopher Eccleston is a god among men. :-) The new revelation of the Doctor's tragic past is the kind of thing that seems so exactly right you wonder why it was never done before. As soon as I caught on to where this was headed, I was actively willing them to go through with it. And they did.

Lastly, I must give a nod to the effects which ranged from the merely very pretty to genuinely stunning. There were a couple of exterior shots of the station that didn't quite convince, but broadly speaking this was an incredibly rich and visually polished episode. The little metal critters were extremely well done, as was the last human.

Overall, the dialogue was snappy (the phone bill, the "retro" air conditioning, etc.), the tone light but with substance, and the overall feel was exactly right for the show. I found the whole thing hugely, hugely entertaining.

(Oh, and Meme! Meme!)

Date: 2005-04-02 01:56 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] icundell.livejournal.com
Aw heck, it was worth it for the iPod joke alone.

Date: 2005-04-03 01:46 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ajp.livejournal.com
Yeah, that was funny.

Date: 2005-04-02 02:30 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] xsabx.livejournal.com
Needless to say Christopher Eccleston is a god among men. :-)

Ho yus. I am surprised I didn't get this a lot earlier, as I have wasted years not lusting after this man like the obsessed Nerd I am...

Date: 2005-04-02 03:03 pm (UTC)
ext_36172: (Default)
From: [identity profile] fba.livejournal.com
The fan itself is a good example of just how narrowly the episode walked the line between "fun" and "ridiculous".

That made me laugh - I'm sure it was a poke at the obligatory 'game' moment that seems to be in all Sci Fi flicks these days. They did something very similar in Galaxy Quest :)

Date: 2005-04-02 03:10 pm (UTC)
ext_12818: (Default)
From: [identity profile] iainjclark.livejournal.com
I'm sure it was a poke at the obligatory 'game' moment that seems to be in all Sci Fi flicks these days. They did something very similar in Galaxy Quest :)

And it was very funny in Galaxy Quest. Here, there was certainly a wry humour about the sheer unlikelihood of having F-off big fans and a switch at the far end. :-) As with Galaxy Quest though, I don't think this was so much a dig at "computer game" moments in films, as a very broad nod towards the contrived nature of some of the perils in the SF action genre. It's like Will Smith complaining about the lack of handrails in I, Robot.

Date: 2005-04-03 04:54 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] immortalradical.livejournal.com
I'm sure it was a poke at the obligatory 'game' moment that seems to be in all Sci Fi flicks these days.

Is this the legendary Who fan's 'if it's rubbish and on Who, it must be knowing parody' defense in action? :P

Date: 2005-04-03 05:00 am (UTC)
ext_12818: (Default)
From: [identity profile] iainjclark.livejournal.com
Is this the legendary Who fan's 'if it's rubbish and on Who, it must be knowing parody' defense in action? :P

In all honesty I think some bits of Ye Olde Doctor Who need "excusing" to varying degrees. It's not a perfect show; just one where the good bits are worth persevering. :-)

In this case, though, I thought the Doctor's lovely remark about the retro air conditioning was a deliberate way of getting around the ridiculousness of the thing, by having the character explicitly draw attention to it.

Date: 2005-04-03 01:55 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ajp.livejournal.com
Yeah, it was all pretty good stuff. I'm not sure about the "Last Timelord" moment. It could (as other's have suggested) be the first hint of a B-5 style uber-arc - which would be good. On the other-hand doesn't something this drastic needlessly complicate the Doctor's "past"? Whilst I'm not advocating fan-boy "Galifrey" episodes - by drawing such a firm line as this under them; don't we risk being drawn into them by default?

Date: 2005-04-03 03:14 am (UTC)
ext_12818: (Default)
From: [identity profile] iainjclark.livejournal.com
No, I definitely think it's about simplification, not complication. It does two things well:

1) it prunes back the snarled and tangled Gallifreyan backstory for the Doctor, stripping him to the bare essentials (insert *snerk* here) of a quixotic loner. That's the core appeal of the charcter, after all. It has the added bonus that he now has a dark note of tragedy and mystery.

2) it replaces the old backstory with the single thread of a tragic past - a war which wiped out his planet. This is a thread that is easily grasped by old and new audiences alike, but which can gradually be unravelled to reveal depth and complexity if the need arises.

I suppose there's the danger that the revelation will get complicated (although it's hard to imagine anything more complicated than all the previous Gallifreyan political machinations) but that will hopefully be offset by it being new to the new series, and explained gradually.

Date: 2005-04-03 04:16 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] veggiesu.livejournal.com
it prunes back the snarled and tangled Gallifreyan backstory for the Doctor, stripping him to the bare essentials (insert *snerk* here) of a quixotic loner. That's the core appeal of the charcter, after all. It has the added bonus that he now has a dark note of tragedy and mystery

Christopher Ecclestone stripped to his bare essentials.... *sigh*

Um, moving on... I think that this plays to Ecclestone's strengths as an actor. We've all been mentioning the fact that they've very carefully balanced the lightness and humour with more serious moments, and much of the success of this is, I think, down to Ecclestone. I knew he could play dark and intense, but I wasn't aware of how well he could play chipper and oh-so-slightly-manic as well. So by providing *his* doctor with the pared-down and tragic backstory, it's really giving him an opportunity to shine, and also exploiting his talents. I'm really not sure that (for example) Colin Baker or Sylvester McCoy could have carried it off so well.

Date: 2005-04-03 05:45 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] chance88088.livejournal.com
Christopher Ecclestone stripped to his bare essentials...

mmmmmmmmm

*blink* were people talking about something?

Date: 2005-04-03 10:38 am (UTC)
ext_12818: (Default)
From: [identity profile] iainjclark.livejournal.com
I'm really not sure that (for example) Colin Baker or Sylvester McCoy could have carried it off so well.

You've just made me imagine them trying, and the results weren't pretty... especially Sylvester McCoy, who in his very best moments had perhaps 1000th of the gravitas that Christopher Eccleston brings to the role.

More importantly, I never really liked and empathised with either of their Doctors, especially not compared to the way the current Doctor is portrayed, so it wouldn't have had nearly the same impact.

Date: 2005-04-04 05:40 am (UTC)
ext_36172: (Default)
From: [identity profile] fba.livejournal.com
Colin Baker or Sylvester McCoy

They both had a different kind of manic, dark and f**cked up. McCoy used to regularly f**k with Ace's head - he was just getting started when the show got canned... With Colin Baker I felt terribly short-changed, as he never really had time to settle into the role, but when Ecclestone goes it won't feel like a lost opportunity.

Eccelstone's Doctor doesn't have any characteristics that aren't aleady *in* the character - they have been spruced up and given a modern spin. I don't think that previous Doctors could do it the *way* Eccelstone has done it - but they did it their own way... What Ecclestone has done, which makes him unique, is that he has made the character his from the outset. I think RTD has played a large part in how the new Doctor has turned out - he knew he wouldn't have time to develop the character slowly and I'm very impressed with how quickly they have got the show up and running (as it were).

Date: 2005-04-03 01:55 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ajp.livejournal.com
especially liked his little "zen" moment of stepping though the fan

That was great.

Date: 2005-04-03 04:07 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] icundell.livejournal.com
April 3rd, 2005 - 09:55 am
especially liked his little "zen" moment of stepping though the fan

That was great.


Use the F...
++++++++CONNECTION TERMINATED+++++++

Date: 2005-04-03 05:03 am (UTC)
ext_12818: (Default)
From: [identity profile] iainjclark.livejournal.com
Lucasfilm's shock troops have entered the building....

Profile

iainjclark: Dave McKean Sandman image (Default)
iainjclark

July 2014

S M T W T F S
  1 2 345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 7th, 2025 12:56 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios