iainjclark: Dave McKean Sandman image (TV)
[personal profile] iainjclark
Sky Continuity Announcer after SG-1 this week: "Coming up next, sci-fi meets drama in Battlestar Galactica". Because, as we know, sci-fi and drama are normally mutually exclusive. Last week the same announcer's line was: "Forget Sci-Fi, this is real drama." Bad enough he says these things over the end credits of Stargate SG-1, but what is this fascination with trying to promote Battlestar Galactica by simultaneously distancing it from and belittling other Sci-Fi shows?

Meanwhile this week's episode of SG-1 included a not so subtle dig at the programme's cancellation:

Guest Character: I'm a bit disapointed at this facility, I was expecting more.
Carter: Well at times so do we, the truth is the Stargate program doesn't get the support it used to from the people in charge.
Guest Character: That's too bad 'cause after all your Stargate program has accomplished for this network - of planets, I would think the decision makers would show it the respect it deserves.

There were a couple of other sly digs in there too. Luckily, although the news of cancellation came too late to wrap up the show's plot threads, there are a couple of TV movies in the pipeline, one of which will apparently deal with the Ori storyline.

Date: 2007-03-05 06:31 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] veggiesu.livejournal.com
Hee! Por ded SG-1...

Date: 2007-03-05 08:22 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] abigail-n.livejournal.com
I might have felt more inclined to sympathize with the show's writers if the episode containing this scene wasn't such a stultifying waste of air time. Three episodes to go, and this soporific dreck is what they come up with? I don't expect great things from SG-1, but at the very least the show should be entertaining.

Date: 2007-03-05 10:11 am (UTC)
ext_12818: (Default)
From: [identity profile] iainjclark.livejournal.com
It was a fairly atrocious episode, I agree. Probably one of the least entertaining I've seen, and all the worse for being 'funny' and 'charming'.

Date: 2007-03-05 10:16 am (UTC)
ext_12818: (TV)
From: [identity profile] iainjclark.livejournal.com
Forgot to say that I think this stultifying episode was commissioned before they knew they only had a few episodes to go - although that's not really an excuse.

Date: 2007-03-05 10:28 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] tizzle-b.livejournal.com
It is very much SG1's equivalent of "The Girl in Question".

Both episodes left me quite, quite annoyed with the lack of progress when you've just two episodes to follow.

Stupid

Date: 2007-03-05 11:57 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] snowking.livejournal.com
Aaaaah fuck. Years of repressing undone in an instant, Tommeh.

Date: 2007-03-05 12:14 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] tizzle-b.livejournal.com
I had to watch it on Sky One (or Sky Two?) a while ago.

It hurt me.

Luckily VM/Sky being kids has repressed it for me again now.

Date: 2007-03-05 12:50 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] abigail-n.livejournal.com
I see the parallel, but "The Girl in Question" does have, in theory, a reason for existing. Three episodes before the end of Angel's show, it makes a certain amount of sense to return to the Buffy issue. There's absolutely no conceivable reason to drag Vala's paint-by-numbers family issues on screen with only three hours left to go in the show.

Also, "The Girl in Question", for all its many problems, was not boring.

Date: 2007-03-05 01:03 pm (UTC)
ext_12818: (Default)
From: [identity profile] iainjclark.livejournal.com
I think I saw a suggestion that in the Buffy S8 comic Buffy's liaison with The Immortal will be assumed never to have happened, it being a decoy who was in Rome. This would be a good thing, I think.

Date: 2007-03-05 08:34 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] majuran.livejournal.com
The Girl in Question was GENIUS!

Date: 2007-03-05 11:44 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] tizzle-b.livejournal.com
You're sick.

Consult yourself.

Date: 2007-03-08 12:05 am (UTC)
ext_12818: (Default)
From: [identity profile] iainjclark.livejournal.com
I've always felt that The Girl in Question was a surefire comedy winner - on paper. The premise is comedy gold. It's just that it's a one-joke episode and the execution of that one joke falls utterly flat. I don't know if it's the writing, the acting, or just the fact that it sits at a point in the season where the last story you want to be watching is the one they made.

Date: 2007-03-05 08:56 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] coalescent.livejournal.com
Sky Continuity Announcer after SG-1 this week: "Coming up next, sci-fi meets drama in Battlestar Galactica".

Paging Dave Langford ...

Date: 2007-03-05 10:46 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ninebelow.livejournal.com
I really don't know how many times Langford is going to be able to run marginally different iterations of the same sentence. Maybe television should be disqualified from How Others See Us. Or maybe the whole thing should be dropped as the persecution complex moaning that it is.

Date: 2007-03-05 11:34 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] coalescent.livejournal.com
I think these days it's not so much about a persecution complex as it is about pointing and laughing at idiots.

Date: 2007-03-05 09:31 am (UTC)
ext_36172: (Default)
From: [identity profile] fba.livejournal.com
Forget Sci-Fi, this is real drama.

Presumably they are trying to warn people how dull BSG is...

Date: 2007-03-05 10:18 am (UTC)
ext_12818: (Default)
From: [identity profile] iainjclark.livejournal.com
:-P I suppose the pilot mini-series was fairly low key but these days it's all snogging and fisticuffs.

Profile

iainjclark: Dave McKean Sandman image (Default)
iainjclark

July 2014

S M T W T F S
  1 2 345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 20th, 2025 09:07 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios