iainjclark: Dave McKean Sandman image (TV)
[personal profile] iainjclark
Oh god. I've seen photos from tonight's 200th episode of the entertaining-yet-meh Stargate SG-1.

I may never scrub my mind clean. And now, neither may you.

Click for a bigger version

And as if it's not bad enough that they've imported half the cast of Farscape, now they're doing homages.







It's the Wizard of Oz pic that's truly disturbing me. Apparently the 'plot' involves the characters pitching ideas for a spin-off movie based on the fake SG-1 style show Wormhole Xtreme.

Needless to say it looks deeply, deeply silly.

Date: 2006-08-18 09:01 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] coalescent.livejournal.com
This is almost enough to make me watch an episode of Stargate.

Date: 2006-08-18 09:06 pm (UTC)
ext_12818: (Default)
From: [identity profile] iainjclark.livejournal.com
I'm not entirely sure why I'm still watching. I'm also not entirely sure how it's reached 200 episodes. I feel certain these two things are related.

(You should actually ave watched the two-parter that was up for the Hugo the other year, as that was at least trying to be Art. Most of the time SG-1 is trying to fill an hour of TV in a vaguely undemanding fashion.)

But yes, this one looks worth watching, in a Smile Time kind of way.

Date: 2006-08-18 09:14 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] veggiesu.livejournal.com
Which episode was up for the Hugo?

Date: 2006-08-18 09:29 pm (UTC)
ext_12818: (Default)
From: [identity profile] iainjclark.livejournal.com
"Heroes", a two-parter with Saul Rubinek as an annoying journalist doing a piece on the Stargate Program. It starts out looking like one of those stories where an outsider views the regular characters, but ends up being a quite heartfelt story about news journalism and freedom of speech. It's patchy, but it gets steadily better as it goes along and I was quite impressed by it. Then again, it's hands down the most ambitious thing SG-1 has put out in at least five years, so the benchmark is low.

More here.

Date: 2006-08-18 10:23 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] veggiesu.livejournal.com
Oh, I remember that one (I do watch SG-1 as a rule); I really liked it. The second ep was definitely better than the first, but lie you say, as a pair, they worked much better than almost any other "message" episode that SG-1 has tried.

Date: 2006-08-18 10:48 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] abigail-n.livejournal.com
My theory about Stargate's resilience is that it's the Law & Order of genre television. It's a show that never gets any better or any worse, it rarely tries to step out of a very simple mold, and you can jump in and out and in again at just about any point without needing any sort of introduction. It has just the right level of mediocrity to go on forever.

Continuing the analogy, Stargate: Atlantis is the Special Victims Unit of the franchise. It pretends to be working within the same framework as its parent show (to the point that most of its stories are outright ripoffs of SG1 episodes, as well as other shows and movies) but its writers haven't quite managed to replicate the older show's steady clip. Instead, they constantly veer into increasingly fantastic and operatic storylines, which are for the most part quite terrible, but with occasional glimmers of something resembling quality.

Date: 2006-08-18 11:01 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] veggiesu.livejournal.com
My theory about Stargate's resilience is that it's the Law & Order of genre television.

So, Law &Order isn't genre TV?

Date: 2006-08-19 08:56 pm (UTC)
ext_12818: (Default)
From: [identity profile] iainjclark.livejournal.com
I call this comment as the most blatant Niall-bait in recent memory.

Date: 2006-08-19 08:59 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] veggiesu.livejournal.com
And yet, he hasn't touched it :-p

Date: 2006-08-19 09:04 pm (UTC)
ext_12818: (Default)
From: [identity profile] iainjclark.livejournal.com
Apparently even the lure of a discussion about genre can't overcome his lack of interest in cops on TV...

(Oh, and by the way I notice that Elizabeth Rohm from Angel is now on Law & Order)

Date: 2006-08-19 10:49 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] veggiesu.livejournal.com
I'm not sure he'd quite understand the "genre != SF" argument :-p

(And I've only rarely seen episodes of Law & Order, oddly enough - it's the sort of thing that would really appeal to me, I've just never gotten around to watching it).

Date: 2006-08-21 07:13 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] coalescent.livejournal.com
How has this become about me when it was Abigail that used the expression? :p

Date: 2006-08-21 06:38 pm (UTC)
ext_12818: (Default)
From: [identity profile] iainjclark.livejournal.com
You and discussions about genre have become inextricably linked. For some reason.

Date: 2006-08-20 10:41 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] abigail-n.livejournal.com
Oh, and by the way I notice that Elizabeth Rohm from Angel is now on Law & Order

Well, she was. I think she only lasted a season.

Date: 2006-08-21 06:39 pm (UTC)
ext_12818: (Default)
From: [identity profile] iainjclark.livejournal.com
Ah! We're several years behind in the UK.

Date: 2006-08-18 11:47 pm (UTC)
ext_12818: (Default)
From: [identity profile] iainjclark.livejournal.com
I agree, although from my limited viewing of Law & Order: SVU I find it bears a closer resemblance to actual drama than its parent show (which is basically an unrelenting series of expository scenes presented slightly too quickly for them to register any impact.)

Atlantis veers between being suffocatingly inoffensive and genuinely offensive. Some of the recent episodes have veered into an ends-justify-the-means philosophy that is no doubt intended to feel gritty but leaves a bad taste in my mouth.

Date: 2006-08-19 12:19 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] abigail-n.livejournal.com
Yeah, it's true that Atlantis suffers from moral schizophrenia. To be honest, I think you might be giving the writers too much credit when you suggest that they're aiming for a gritty tone. I think they really do believe that their characters' actions are moral, which makes for a very strange and, at times, almost unbearable viewing experience.

But given SVU's sensationalistic tone and the way it whole-heartedly buys into (and in many ways, propagates) the culture of pedophile hysteria (which is not to say that pedophiles are not something to get hysterical about, but SVU treats them as something inhuman, at times almost supernaturally so) and actively promotes an ends-justify-the-means approach to such individuals, I'm not sure that my analogy doesn't hold.

Date: 2006-08-19 08:41 pm (UTC)
ext_12818: (Default)
From: [identity profile] iainjclark.livejournal.com
I agree about the way SVU (and other US detective drama such as Without a Trace or CSI) plays into pedophile hysteria - rather as they do for serial killers. TV often loves to characterise such types as visibly abnormal, their sin written all over their shifty, pallid, leering faces. It's convenient for TV writers to have a villain who can be safely characterised as absolutely and irredeemably evil without the need to worry about characterisation, motive etc. It also comfortingly and rather complacently labels such criminals as Other - not part of society, and not people we may know.

(Obviously I don't condone crimes as abhorrent as pedophilia or rape in any way, any more than I condone any kind of violent crime or abuse, but you're right about the way that SVU plays into the OTT media stereotypes.)

Atlantis of course invented the ultimate in one-dimensional motiveless villains in the Wraith, only to slightly humanise them at the very time that it condones their abuse.

Date: 2006-08-22 10:10 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] abigail-n.livejournal.com
And now, apparently, the show is cancelled. So much for my L&O analogy.

I'm hardly upset, but it does seem a little mean to drop the axe in the middle of the 200th episode celebrations.

Date: 2006-08-23 04:31 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] veggiesu.livejournal.com
Stargate's been cancelled?

Date: 2006-08-23 07:09 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] abigail-n.livejournal.com
Yup.

Atlantis has been renewed, though (although cynics in the fan community have pointed out that a fourth season is necessary for the show to go into syndication, and there's a lot of speculation that if its ratings don't pick up, Atlantis will be in the dustbin this time next year), and there are some rumors about SG1 actors crossing over.

Date: 2006-08-23 08:53 pm (UTC)
ext_12818: (Default)
From: [identity profile] iainjclark.livejournal.com
It's funny because I was under the (probably mistaken) impression that Atlantis was sllightly outperforming SG-1 and even Battlestar Galactica in the ratings.

Date: 2006-08-24 07:04 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] abigail-n.livejournal.com
From what I've gathered, Atlantis is outperforming SG1, but not to the point where its ratings are impressive. No idea on BSG, but that show has other factors keeping it afloat - as one of the most critically beloved shows on TV, it gives the Sci Fi channel some much needed cachet.

Date: 2006-08-24 07:35 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] veggiesu.livejournal.com
Damn :-(

Date: 2006-08-18 09:14 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] veggiesu.livejournal.com
OMDFG, that's... that's burning my eyes *and* my brain.

*shudder*

Date: 2006-08-18 10:21 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ajp.livejournal.com
Hmm...

I could quite happily have lived without seeing that first picture. It's quite disturbing, it many different ways.

And the puppets aren't much better...

Date: 2006-08-18 11:51 pm (UTC)
ext_12818: (Default)
From: [identity profile] iainjclark.livejournal.com
See, now you can join me in the scrubbing of the brain.

Date: 2006-08-19 09:15 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ajp.livejournal.com
Thanks... :-)

Date: 2006-08-19 06:39 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] majuran.livejournal.com
Sheer genius :D

I just got in, and you're now making me want to stay up to watch it. You're a bad, bad man :P

Date: 2006-08-19 11:08 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] tizzle-b.livejournal.com
I really really really really really liked it.

It was - well - quality.

ESPECIALLY the ending.

And the Furlings.

Quality.

Date: 2006-08-23 08:56 pm (UTC)
ext_12818: (Serenity)
From: [identity profile] iainjclark.livejournal.com
The Furlings were quality.

I especially liked the fact that they played with the "Previously on" sequence in order to include scenes from a disturbingly convincing Ewok Furling episode. Having a fake "Previously" is about as meta as it gets.

Date: 2006-08-19 12:42 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] despotliz.livejournal.com
I haven't really watched Stargate for years, but I think I will have to download this one. Does it require any prior knowledge? I've seen Wormhole Xtreme!.

Date: 2006-08-19 12:59 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] majuran.livejournal.com
I /think/ that will do. There's a few references to bits that have happened in between though natch (so meta it hurts probably sums up the ep quite nicely :)).

Date: 2006-08-19 08:43 pm (UTC)
ext_12818: (Default)
From: [identity profile] iainjclark.livejournal.com
so meta it hurts

Sounds good. I'm still waiting for it to download - seems to be taking an age.

Date: 2006-08-19 11:10 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] tizzle-b.livejournal.com
WAS ACE
(am SG1 fan and have watched constantly, well - downloaded past 3 seasons and before that using Sky. And lots of Sky One daily repeats back when they used to share Buffy/SG1 on the primetime repeat-frenzy).

So have patches on eps but mostly good)

Date: 2006-08-21 07:14 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] coalescent.livejournal.com
I thought the very end was a nice touch. But I would, of course.

Date: 2006-08-21 06:43 pm (UTC)
ext_12818: (Default)
From: [identity profile] iainjclark.livejournal.com
Waxing lyrical about the infinite potential of SF would have had more resonance if Stargate actually bothered using SF to make a point these days. :-)

Date: 2006-08-21 06:43 pm (UTC)
ext_12818: (Default)
From: [identity profile] iainjclark.livejournal.com
I enjoyed it, particularly the way that every last throwaway line appeared to be a reference to something specific, but it wasn't, like, totally the best thing EVAH.

Profile

iainjclark: Dave McKean Sandman image (Default)
iainjclark

July 2014

S M T W T F S
  1 2 345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 13th, 2025 05:45 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios