Date: 2005-04-03 04:16 am (UTC)
it prunes back the snarled and tangled Gallifreyan backstory for the Doctor, stripping him to the bare essentials (insert *snerk* here) of a quixotic loner. That's the core appeal of the charcter, after all. It has the added bonus that he now has a dark note of tragedy and mystery

Christopher Ecclestone stripped to his bare essentials.... *sigh*

Um, moving on... I think that this plays to Ecclestone's strengths as an actor. We've all been mentioning the fact that they've very carefully balanced the lightness and humour with more serious moments, and much of the success of this is, I think, down to Ecclestone. I knew he could play dark and intense, but I wasn't aware of how well he could play chipper and oh-so-slightly-manic as well. So by providing *his* doctor with the pared-down and tragic backstory, it's really giving him an opportunity to shine, and also exploiting his talents. I'm really not sure that (for example) Colin Baker or Sylvester McCoy could have carried it off so well.
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

Profile

iainjclark: Dave McKean Sandman image (Default)
iainjclark

July 2014

S M T W T F S
  1 2 345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 10th, 2025 05:16 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios