Date: 2006-10-08 11:15 pm (UTC)
I enjoyed the panel game with religion.

It was pointedly pointy, sure, but was it proper comedy or Sorkin doing his thing? It only had close to funny line - the one about secularists eroding God's protective shell around the US. The rest felt strained to me. It was the sort of thing that was a good idea for a sketch, but obviously not written by a sketchwriter. Which, of course, it wasn't - but we are supposed to believe it is.

I mean, sure, SNL isn't always funny. If Sorkin were writing a show about how SNL isn't actually that funny, that would work. Unfortunately, he is writing a show about how SNL could be funny if it was written and performed by people as brave and wunnerful as his characters. Like TWW, it asks 'what if?' The problem is, Sorkin could write politics. He can't write comedy. I believe Jed is a genius and a fabulous politician because he gets clever lines and cogent philosophies. I do not believe Matt is the great writer I'm being told he is, or Danny the great director, or Harriet the great comedian. And that's a problem.
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

Profile

iainjclark: Dave McKean Sandman image (Default)
iainjclark

July 2014

S M T W T F S
  1 2 345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 17th, 2025 02:29 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios