iainjclark (
iainjclark) wrote2006-11-13 12:08 am
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Entry tags:
Torchwood - "Small Worlds"
Well, blow me if that wasn't a decent episode of Torchwood. Maybe miracles do happen.
Okay, so there were still some over-sold moments, the music was awful and John Barrowman *really* can't do the range of emotions required for the role, but overall this successfully focused on mood and storytelling over cliched character-conflict for its own sake. The CGI was a bit on the cartoonish side but the design of the creatures worked well, and for once they took some darker plot decisions without it feeling overly forced.
The preceding episodes tried much harder than this one, without being anything like as effective. In fact the whole episode only served to highlight the vast gulf that separates making vaguely mature genre television from whatever the hell Torchwood has been doing over the past several weeks. (Largely standing around shouting "Look at me, aren't I Gritty, Sexy and Dark?")
Sadly next week's episode comes to you from the writer of "Cyberwoman" so I don't expect this to become a trend.
Okay, so there were still some over-sold moments, the music was awful and John Barrowman *really* can't do the range of emotions required for the role, but overall this successfully focused on mood and storytelling over cliched character-conflict for its own sake. The CGI was a bit on the cartoonish side but the design of the creatures worked well, and for once they took some darker plot decisions without it feeling overly forced.
The preceding episodes tried much harder than this one, without being anything like as effective. In fact the whole episode only served to highlight the vast gulf that separates making vaguely mature genre television from whatever the hell Torchwood has been doing over the past several weeks. (Largely standing around shouting "Look at me, aren't I Gritty, Sexy and Dark?")
Sadly next week's episode comes to you from the writer of "Cyberwoman" so I don't expect this to become a trend.
no subject
Also, it's nice to know that the Torchwood writers' definition of 'pansexual' is 'will shag anyone conventionally good looking so long as they're within an acceptable age bracket.' The real Jack Harkness would have picked up where he and Estelle left off.
no subject
I didn't find the effects laughable - I thought they were quite evocative in the context of the story - but they definitely had a regrettably cartoonish quality. The episode needed something more photorealistic.
And yes, Jack is entirely open to flirting with anything that moves, as long as it's a good looking woman. In fact he's been even more sexually conventional on this show than he was on Doctor Who. I kept waiting for him to kiss Estelle on the lips - something that would even hint in that direction. But no.
no subject
I wasn't talking about the CGI fairies, actually - I agree that they were decent enough. What was laughable were the practical effects - the wind and rain and the petals pouring out of peoples' mouths. In none of these cases did I believe that the characters were in actual danger (Estelle in particular seemed to just lie down and die, not drown).
no subject
I blame the actress - potentially it was a great part but she just wasn't very good.
no subject
no subject
Likewise the water was certainly not heavy enough to drown someone - even someone as frail as the old lady - but it was pretty heavy. It could easily have continued to worsen between our last glimpse of it and the team's arrival.
no subject
no subject
no subject
I was going to say exactly that. This episode was functionally and episode of the X Files. Jack was very Mulder, and Eve was very Scully...
"I kept waiting for him to kiss Estelle on the lips - something that would even hint in that direction. But no."
I agree with your points about his sexuality; but I can accept that he didn't do that, on the basis that it would have broken his version of his story. To Estelle, he was after all, Jack's son.
no subject
I dunno; as
no subject